On 19-Jan-08, at 12:26, Shawn King wrote: > On 1/17/08 2:56 AM, "Eugene" <list-themacintoshguy at fsck.net> wrote: > >> In contrast, The MacBook Air is >> designed for the ultra-portable market where weight and bulk far >> outweigh CPU power and expandability. It is a focused product for >> a specific (and larger) target audience. It is not aimed for the >> desktop user, or for the portable user who really prefer a portable >> desktop (MacBook) or workstation (MacBook Pro). > > Finally - a voice of sanity... :) > -- > Shawn King > Host/Executive Producer > Your Mac Life > http://www.yourmaclifeshow.com I have to put my vote in against the Air. And for one reason only. Price. I can't justify the price vs. functionality. Sure it is sexy and slim (just like a super model), but it is also expensive and fragile. I'm sure there are people who will value what the Air doesn't have (thickness and 3 pounds) and it's status (Mac snobbery at its highest), but I'm not one of them. And the dozens of people I've spoken with about the Air are all in agreement. If the Air was $800, I'd be enthused about it, as it would make a great ultra-portable 'accessory Mac'. But it is $1800 (the price of a high end MacBook with 4GB of 3rd party RAM, AND accessories like a case, mouse, cables, adapters, etc) and the Air requires additional hardware to be fully functional. Now that hardware may be another Mac, or a PC, or it could be the optional superdrive. The built-in battery is also an insult that Apple is continuing to push on us consumers in more devices. First it was iPods, then the iPhone, now the MB Air. I'd been waiting for MacWorld and this announcement. Now I'm going to vote with my $ (like I did last year when I bought a Nokia E61 rather than an iPhone). And despite being the president of a MUG and a Mac consultant, I'm going to buy an Asus Eee PC. Sorry Apple, but my MacBook Pro is portable enough for me, and 3 Eee PC's will do more for me and my family than one MB Air. Regards, Dave