Zane The weight reduction is one good thing. The thickness is equally as good for some situations. For my husband - take a flight bag, associated paperwork, one company supplied ibm thinkpad, try to cram in a MacBook - adds up to a very full flight bag. For me - after travelling so much for the last twenty years, the smaller the bag I can carry the better and if that allows me to get everything including a laptop into a carry on bag, that is worth it. I will keep the MacBook Pro at home. Wendy On 21 Jan 2008, at 10:03, Zane H. Healy wrote: I am curious about one thing, everyone is interested in the weight aspect, shoot that's what interests me about it, that and the size. How many people care about the thickness (I don't)? I think that part of why it costs so much is the thickness, yet I would think that if they'd gone a little thicker they could have saved money, and still come in at about the same weight. That special CPU can't be cheap, and might be the reason for the $550-700 price difference. Wendy Austin & Thomas Oswin Pomponette via Surinam Mauritius Island Mob: +2302560182