On 26/07/2008, at 11:09 AM, Zane H. Healy wrote: >>> >>> As many/most here know, stability concerns are only half of what >>> has kept me on 10.4.11, the other issue is the fact 10.5 can't run >>> classic software. Considering they're apparently dropping PPC >>> support altogether with 10.6, they really should have left that in >>> 10.5. >> >> They are giving you advance notice to start moving to an Intel >> platform so that when 10.6 is released and no longer supports PPC, >> you can't whinge and complain that you didn't know that great >> change was coming. > > You're missing the point. Since 10.5 is the end of the line for the > PPC, it should have also been the end of the line for Classic. > Somehow I doubt the decision was made to drop PPC support after 10.5 > was released. > Why should it have been the end of the road for Classic? That's only your opinion. As I understand it, Classic and the end of support for PPC are not linked in any way. Classic, as I understand it, relates to OS9 PPC, as I understand it relates to hardware (PPC -> Intel) There is no direct correlation between them other than one you want to make up. cjc