Huh?? Where can you "hide" (in Montana or elsewhere) with a cell phone that has cell phone reception!? on 6/17/08 10:54 PM, Jens Selvig at lstnmt at bresnan.net wrote: > On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Geoffrey Loeffler wrote: > >> The basic theory is sound and seems harmless, carry a cell phone and >> your safer. However to get that safety, we give up certain rights. >> It may not seem important when your handling that bright new shiny >> iPhone, but our calls can be monitored without a warrant, by any >> Homeland Land Security Specialist. The tracking device inside the >> phone lets any one monitor your movements again with out a warrant >> or your knowledge. I think that is a pretty big trade off and since >> as it was pointed out that land lines are disappearing, so shall the >> right to speak in privacy to someone on a telephone. >> > Please document this idea that 'anyone' can track where you are with > any cell phone. I know some places in Montana that you might want to > move to. Places where you really will have privacy and no one will see > you or what you do or don't do. > > Be paranoid. It is fine with me. I suppose if I were 'big brother' the > first people I'd start watching is those who are paranoid! I'd bet > Homeland Security is already monitoring these very list serves! > > >> We give up something for every bit of technology that we develop >> today, mostly because we forgot, that those people we let get in >> charge, are only supposed to do what we tell them to, not follow >> what they tell us to do. Some how that ideal, that invb=wnru >> >> The device that saved your friends life, has cost many lives, it is >> the preferred weapon of the people of the countries we now occupy >> with over 175,000 troops and close to 6000 American dead and 60,000 >> wounded. It seems they work well at setting off IADs. This may not >> effect you in Montana but today, I am sure it effected someone. To >> bad that what we do invent is so often used for some good things, >> but a lot of bad also. Not trying to make a political statement, >> just showing both sides of technology and how our present state of >> mind takes as much as it seems to give. > > > It used to be axes that were the preferred method of murdering. Guess > we have moved past that now. > > IF really want to stop mayhem probably removing cars from our society > would be the very first thing to get rid of. Who would have thought > how horrible of a device cars would turn out to be. So I guess I agree > with you those technological innovations are pretty bad for the > society as a whole! > > Since this is off topic and probably senseless I'll stop posting. > > Jens > > > Jens Selvig > ...Lost in Montana... > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Seven Cent Deals - Great legacy stuff Great Legacy Price > http://www.drbott.com/prod/db.lasso?cat=Seven+Cent+Deal