[X4U] OS History (was: "Backwards Compatibility")
Zane H. Healy
healyzh at aracnet.com
Sun Jun 22 12:24:34 PDT 2008
>At 12:05 -0400 6/22/08, Jon wrote:
>On Jun 21, 2008, "Zane H. Healy"
><<mailto:healyzh at aracnet.com>healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
>
>Interesting how Apple has taken an OS that started out on the 68030,
>had x86, Sparc, and PA-RISC support added for V3.1, then supported
>all three through V4.2, at which point they removed 68k, Sparc and
>PA-RISC support to add in PPC support.
>
>I really would appreciate it if you had a citation for this, especially
>x86 support.
>
>I assume when you talk about support, you mean the ability to run
>on computers with those chips (x86, Sparc, and PA-RISC). Never
>happened until Boot Camp!
>
>
>I think he's talking about the Next OS rather than Mac OS or Mac OS neXt.
>
>But it is said that all versions of the Mac classic OS were compiled
>for the X86 because Apple wanted Motorola to know there was an
>option. I don't think any binaries ever left Cupertino.
I guess I was being a little to subtle. Yes, I was talking about
NeXTStep, after all in spite of what the reality distortion field
might have you believe, we're running NeXTStep, not the classic Mac
OS. Nothing here has anything to do with emulation. Not a good
citation, but here is a time-line of sorts. It seems a bit ragged in
the 4.x timeframe, so take the dates with grain of salt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXTSTEP
A Sparc 5 can run OPENSTEP, and that is about it for the Sparc. I'm
not sure what HP hardware is needed, I think it's one or two models
of the HP 9000. I've been meaning for years to try and get OPENSTEP
4.2 up and running on one of my Sparc 5's. My mind is a bit foggy
here, but I think there were also libraries which would let you run
OPENSTEP applications on Solaris and MS Windows. Perhaps someone
else remembers something on this.
Jon, at least the first 3 developers releases of Mac OS X (aka
Rhapsody) ran on Intel hardware, not PPC. "Prelude to Rhapsody" was
nothing more than OPENSTEP 4.2 (at the time a copy cost several
thousand, so getting a free copy was very cool). The next 2 or three
releases at least ran on Intel hardware and actually had the classic
Mac interface. It was very cool to see something like that booting
on a Pentium 133Mhz system that had been thrown together out of parts
bought from the local PC chop shop.
Doug,
I'm not sure how true it is that all versions of the classic OS ran
on x86. I have my doubts, and this is the first time I've heard of
such a rumor. There was a project in the (early 90's IIRC) to port,
I believe, System 7 to Intel, but that was killed before I bought my
first Mac (I ran PC's for years prior to '95). I am confident that
all versions of Mac OS X have run on x86 hardware, it doesn't make
sense that Apple would have removed that capability, besides look at
how quickly they brought out the Intel Mac's.
Another interesting tidbit of OS history would be the CHRP PPC's that
IBM and Apple were working on in the '95 timeframe. Had the idea
worked out, they'd have run OS/2, AIX, System 7 (Mac OS), and maybe
others all at the same time. I actually saw IBM demo a computer
running both OS/2 and AIX at the same time around '93 at a government
trade show in DC. Now that was *SERIOUSLY* cool! Of course now with
all the x86 virtualization stuff going on, we're finally reaching the
point where this kind of thing actually is being done. Of course IBM
did this decades ago on their mainframes.
What can I say, Operating Systems have been a hobby of mine for
YEARS, I find them to be more fun that computer games.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
More information about the X4U
mailing list