>From: Ed Gould <edgould1948 at comcast.net> >On Sep 28, 2008, at 3:57 AM, David Ledger wrote: > >>> From: Ed Gould <edgould1948 at comcast.net> >>> Do you know of anyone that is offering PGP for mail.app ? I tried >>> Google and the only thing that came up was some hack and it was out >>> of europe (IIRC). >> >> What do you mean by being a 'hack'? > >I mean that it is the author states it will only work with version >x.x and it may have issues with newer versions. If you mean 'only work with version x.x' of the mailer, then either it will or won't work with your emailer - the PGP side should be pretty universal. If you mean 'version x.x' of PGP then it's a limited version and you'd be right to avoid it (unless it's only the very old versions it's not compatible with). >Sometimes you can say >who cares but with PGP the data is encrypted and if can't be >unencrypted because of a version change you are pretty well sunk. ALL >mail that is encrypted is essentially lost. That is what I am >concerned about. You'd normally only use PGP for the transmission of email, not the storage on your computer - you might use an encrypted disc image for that. So the mail isn't lost if there's a PGP compatibility issue, just not readable by the recipient. >By buying that product you can only hope that the >author will forever support the product. There are no guarantees in >computer world and this is a BIG issue. I cannot afford to loose any >email. The open version - GPG - won't have this issue because there will always be enthusiasts. The downside is that it's not (AFAIK) interfaced to Mail and you have to do things to use it. David -- David Ledger - Freelance Unix Sysadmin in the UK. HP-UX specialist of hpUG technical user group (www.hpug.org.uk) david.ledger at ivdcs.co.uk www.ivdcs.co.uk