On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, zapcat wrote: > I have several friends and clients who are not upgrading. Not a scientific > market analysis, but, judging from reports that CS4 sales were > "disappointing," I'd say there's a sizable crowd not forking over for this > expensive bug fest. I assume the lack of CS4 sales can be partially attributed to the lack of 64-bit support on Mac OS X. As near as I can tell, that is the primary feature in CS4, and it is missing on the Mac version. We should have 64-bit support in CS5, and at that point I'll upgrade (as long as I can afford it). Note, I realize that Apple is largely to blame for the lack of 64-bit support on the Mac, since they dropped plans to update for 64-bit a core piece that Adobe depended on. > One thing is certain: I *will not* sink $1700 into adobe's collection of > apps, especially after having seen first-hand and on a daily basis how lousy > it is. I remember when Adobe made truly great software, and there was none of > this lack of backward-compatiblity malarkey... My copy of CS3 Premium started life as a version of Photoshop I paid $15 for back in early '97. I'd have never paid $1700 for it. At the same time I'm quite happy with CS3 Premium, and would have purchased CS4 Premium if not for the lack of 64-bit support. Thanks to my digital photography I do have certain requirements tied to Adobe Camera RAW. CS3 supports my current camera, and mostly works with Adobe Lightroom 2, so I don't *HAVE* to upgrade to CS4. Still as I said, I'd like to be able to upgrade Photoshop more often than CS Premium. Zane