At 8:00 AM -0400 on 3/26/09, Neil Laubenthal wrote: >Quoting David Brostoff <listaddr at earthlink.net>: > >>Of course SuperDuper is a backup program. > >Nope . . .it's a cloning program. That isn't to say that a bootable >clone of your drive isn't a worthwhile addition to your >comprehensive backup strategy . . . it is. > >>Software that creates and retains duplicates of each new version of a >>file, such as Retrospect, are also backup programs. (The makers of >>Retrospect would like people to believe that programs that create >>clones are not "true" backup programs, but this is only marketing >>speak.) > >Nope again . . .I think a survey of professional system >administrators will tell you that clones aren't backup . . . they're >clones. However, non professionals sometimes get lost by the >distinction . . . <snip> (Sorry to be picking up an old thread--I was traveling and hadn't noticed this reply at first.) Could you please explain in what way a copy (clone) of a hard drive is not a backup of that drive? David