At 19:33 -0500 2/1/09, Neil wrote: >> You say you don't need RAID. Do you have a good way of backing up >>these extra drives (or are they the backup for other places)? If >>not, RAID 5 makes sense. (When will someone make an economical >>external RAID 5 box with 5 drives? It's the simplest, cheapest way >>to do RAID 5). > >I'm planning to use a few drives as back-ups for my three primary >Macs. The other drives are for storage, but I plan to get an 8-bay >USB drive to plug in once a week to back-up the storage and to have >a second back-up for my primary Macs. I don't consider RAID 5 to be >a true back-up solution to itself because it doesn't help if the >problem is data corruption, theft, lightning that destroys more than >one drive, etc. The back-up should be off-line most of the time. RAID isn't meant as a backup solution, it's just a more reliable 'drive'. It will detect disc data corruption, but obviously not application or user data corruption. Neither will mirroring or even cloning or regular backups unless you keep a hierarchy of versions. Time machine with a well oversized TM drive is a good solution here. David -- David Ledger - Freelance Unix Sysadmin in the UK. HP-UX specialist of hpUG technical user group (www.hpug.org.uk) david.ledger at ivdcs.co.uk www.ivdcs.co.uk