Well - I own a lowly Mac-Mini and I love it. For one thing, it is much more upgradable than the iMac. I recently changed the hard drive to a 200 GB 7200rpm unit, and before that, I increased the RAM. Attached to it is a mini-like hard drive with built-in USB2 and FW400 hubs. It drives a 20-in Apple display. Yes, the Mac Pro would be even faster, but all my work (websites, photo-editing, Office stuff, and all the web stuff) is well within its capabilities. I will say, though, the new hard drive did make a measurable improvement over the too-small, 5400 rpm stock unit. Ken On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:53 PM, zapcat wrote: > http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/05/apple_sued_over_defective_imac_displays.html > > > this story, in combination with the earlier one some months ago that > the displays of the lower 2 Aluminum iMac models didn't display the > color depth as advertised makes me feel real urpy and queasy about > buying a new iMac, no matter HOW fast they're predicted to be. > > with so many stories concerning the quality of the iMac platform, I > feel somewhat forced to choose between the extreme low end (Mini) > and extreme high end (Mac Pro). Not that these machines have any > special immunity to flaws, but when you buy an all-in-1, monitor > quality and health matter GREATLY, and it sounds to me like Apple is > taking a "tough luck" stance with iMac customers. > > IMO, that's a deal-breaker. > > > zc > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Seven Cent Deals - Great legacy stuff Great Legacy Pricehttp://www.drbott.com/prod/db.lasso?cat=Seven+Cent+Deal