Boot Camp will not run without it's own partition on the hard disk. Period. Parallels and Fusion will allow you to access a Boot Camp partition and use it as one of your virtual machines. They can also use "virtual hard disks". Virtualbox can only use "virtual hard disks". It cannot use a Boot Camp partition. This may have changed in v3. I haven't had time to test v3 or Virtualbox yet. cjc On 11/07/2009, at 1:02 AM, Craig A. Finseth wrote: > More to the point, Boot Camp really, REALLY, >>REALLY<< wants to run > on a partion on the main HD. > > I tried other configurations and wound up having to reinstall the core > OS from scratch. (It was a new install, so no harm.) > > Craig > > Unless you need/want to run games . . . you might want to consider > either Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion and run Windows inside > Leopard. The speed hit is pretty small with Intel chipped Macs and > the > virtual machine keeps from having to cross-boot and allows drag/drop > from the two environments. > > I've not used Boot Camp; so can't answer your specific > question . . . > just wanted to make sure you had considered all the options. > > > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Bob Aldridge wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’m getting a new iMac next week. I want to install Boot Camp with >> XP.. Are there any advantages to making separate partitions (one for >> XP by itself and the other for MacOS X) on the main HD or just let >> Boot Camp make a partition using its process and leave well enough >> alone. >>