[X4U] 10.5 instead of 10.6
Zane H. Healy
healyzh at aracnet.com
Fri Feb 12 10:44:35 PST 2010
At 9:32 AM +0000 2/12/10, David Ledger wrote:
>At 10:14 -0800 11/2/10, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>>That was my fear. I'd like to be able to say that the instance gets 50% of
>>one core. Though if I can at least limit it to running on a single core,
>>that would help some.
>
>You can limit a VMware Fusion VM to a single CPU's worth of CPU, but
>it's still spread across all CPUs. So 1 CPU means 1/4 of the total
>on a 4 core iMac. Makes me wonder why they limited it to 1, 2 or 4
>on a 4 core machine.
Actually this works for me, as it would keep me from pegging a single
core. I could have a *LOT* of fun with this. :-) Though the other
issue would be how it (and what I'd be running) would handle sharing
the NIC. I am crazy enough I'd love to have TOPS-20, OpenVMS,
RSX-11M+, and RSTS/E all running on the same system under emulators
running on Linux on separate VM's. :-)
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
More information about the X4U
mailing list