At 9:32 AM +0000 2/12/10, David Ledger wrote: >At 10:14 -0800 11/2/10, Zane H. Healy wrote: >>That was my fear. I'd like to be able to say that the instance gets 50% of >>one core. Though if I can at least limit it to running on a single core, >>that would help some. > >You can limit a VMware Fusion VM to a single CPU's worth of CPU, but >it's still spread across all CPUs. So 1 CPU means 1/4 of the total >on a 4 core iMac. Makes me wonder why they limited it to 1, 2 or 4 >on a 4 core machine. Actually this works for me, as it would keep me from pegging a single core. I could have a *LOT* of fun with this. :-) Though the other issue would be how it (and what I'd be running) would handle sharing the NIC. I am crazy enough I'd love to have TOPS-20, OpenVMS, RSX-11M+, and RSTS/E all running on the same system under emulators running on Linux on separate VM's. :-) Zane -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, | | PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. | | http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |