The problem of the newspaper was that it's difficult to read on a Led screen for a long time. I've no idea what it is. I've never seen one myself. But what another one wrote is more striking to me. Bill Gates has made a prediction 8 years ago that a tablet would rule the world. Even better that desktop. Would it now be different while Bill made such a goof? But that second newspaper admit that their guess might be wrong because just a few have seen and worked with the iPad. It's just an assumption from everyone. Me, you and he. Paul Moortgat On 29 Jan 2010, at 23:34, Zane H. Healy wrote: > I think the most important of these is the lack of flash support. > Does anyone know why this is? The lack of multitasking could be a > benefit to the underpowered CPU. What is the problem with the LED > screen? As for the camera, I've mixed views on that. > > Are they complaining about the virtual keyboard? At least I think > I've seen that it includes one. I'd personally want to try it prior > to complaining about it! > > Zane > > > At 11:13 PM +0100 1/29/10, Paul Moortgat wrote: >> In a newspaper in Belgium is an article about the iPad. It's >> called "The flop of the year." >> They'll wait for iPad2. Their complaints: Flash, multitasking, Led >> screen, no camera, virtual keyboard. >> >> Paul Moortgat