[X4U] New Mac Pro's and FW400
Zane H. Healy
healyzh at aracnet.com
Wed Jul 28 08:07:37 PDT 2010
At 10:23 PM -0700 7/27/10, Randy B. Singer wrote:
>On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:45 PM, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
>>Does it mean I can only run FW400 on that port? Realistically at
>>this point it isn't much of a concern, right now I only have 3
>>drive enclosures plugged in. Basically I'm thinking of SCSI where
>>if you have different speed devices, the chain will sync down to
>>the slowest device.
>
>See:
>http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8462657
Thanks Roger, that is an interesting read. The hubs are too
expensive for my tastes, and from experience with other types of
hubs, prone to failure. As a result a PCI Express FW400 card might
be in my future. While it won't be an immediate purchase, it might
be something to get as soon as practical after I get the new system.
As I was typing this, I happened to realize that I do have one very
important FW400 device, the Epson scanner that I use for scanning
film. The combination of that and the Drobo might increase the
importance of a FW400 card.
All in all a lot of "mights" in this. The key thing I took away from
the article is I might or might not experience slowdowns depending on
how I use my devices. Honestly I'm not to happy about all the FW
ports being on the same bus.
This also tells be that between now and when I get the new system I
should probably test a couple things with my scanner to see if the
way I'm using the Drobo is slowing it down.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088@N03/ |
More information about the X4U
mailing list