On Jun 16, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Zane H. Healy wrote: > Once you start beefing a iMac up to Mac Pro levels of RAM, you > might as well > have gone with the Mac Pro. Well, not to disrespect your experience, and as always "YMMV" applies, but a current iMac right out of the box is plenty for most print needs. There is an argument made that the Photoshop Pro requires *the* very latest, most pimped-out rig available, but it doesn't sound like the OP is doing high-end photoshop retouching. Rather, he said something like "It'd be nice to have some extra- muscle." To my mind, this does not bespeak a mission-critical need to be on the absolute cutting edge. and I hate to say it, but while using Photoshop, menu meters shows only 1 of my 16 cores being utilitized most of the time. I might see little blips and spurts in the other cores, but for the most part, Photoshop does *not* harness my Mac Pro to its potential. Blame whoever you want for that, but for my dough, why spend $3K when $1199 will git 'er done just fine? zc