At 17:22 -0400 18/9/10, Doug Metzler wrote: Thanks David I'm doing a finder drag. I'll try a terminal command next, didn't think of that. Would that be cp -r for a directory/folder? Is there any other to try? The data does incrementally appear on the WD drive until the point that the internal drive is full. Then I get a message that the internal drive is nearly full followed a little later by a message that the operation can't be completed because the startup drive is full. I agree that "Copying data directly from one external drive to another should have no effect on the internal drive other than maybe some swap space for the copying process if you're short on memory." which is why I'm confused. It does look like there is some virtual memory swapping going on with the internal drive usage varying a little bit up and down (less then 1G) when other things are going on. I can usually copy over smaller folders, up to about 5G with no problem, and up to about 20G with little problem. But much larger than that it goes crazy. Last night it filled the entire 236G free space on the internal in the process of just trying to copy less than 80G. Doug I generally don't use Finder drag for a large collection of files. Last year I did something similar to you and copied a tree of photos and iMovie projects onto a WD NAS drive with Finder drag. It seemed to save quite a bit of space, so I checked before deleting the originals. Lucky I did. Maybe 5% of the files hadn't been copied. I then copied the missing stuff in smaller chunks. Over several days of doing the next bit when I had a chance I did get it all copied. I also made a copy onto a 2TB USB drive so I could safely remove the originals. I've never felt totally comfortable with Finder drag copy. What's it really doing when it's 'Preparing to copy'? Your problem may indicate that it copies to local disc first. cp -R (rather than -r, there's a comment in the man page) at 10.5 and above should do a recursive copy including resource forks. Early 10.x didn't copy resource forks, and I think needed an option flag to do it in intermediate versions. Not sure where the breakpoints are. Traditional mainstream Unix cp didn't used to have a -R option, so the usual way to copy a tree was cd sourcefolder; tar cf - . | (cd destfolder; tar xvf -) which won't copy resource forks either, but jpg photos don't have resource forks. Useful if you're only copying files without resource forks. The v in xvf means verbose - it lists the files as they are deposited. Omit if you don't want that, but it too can be useful. rsync is also worth checking out. It looks complicated, but most of the complexity is to do with the case where the source or destination is on another machine. David -- David Ledger - Freelance Unix Sysadmin in the UK. HP-UX specialist of hpUG technical user group (www.hpug.org.uk) david.ledger at ivdcs.co.uk www.ivdcs.co.uk