Using vuescan and a Minolta negative /slide scanner, and I always use the carrier(s). Get excellent results, tho sometimes the neg or slide is crappy, the scanner won't fix a bad one. I use vuescan with the flatbed too (Epson). Very happy with that combo, as well. The Epson is capable of scanning negatives or slides - but I don't use it for that. Ken On Mar 25, 2012, at 1:23 PM, "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote: I'm using Vuescan with a Nikon Coolscan IV ED, it applies. One question is, do you have the film strip attachment, or are you feeding the film manually Paul? I typically scan strips of 4-5 shots while doing other stuff. Also, what flatbed did you try? I've also been known to use the scanner as a way to preview working on stuff in the darkroom! :-) Though Vuescan and the Nikon scanner can also rescue stuff that would be largely lost, especially when scanning as a DNG (RAW file). Note to self, don't develop Adox CHS 50 in Rodinal 1:100... You wouldn't believe what a nightmare these were to scan, and I'm pretty sure I can't get a decent print off of them in the Darkroom. Though once it warms up a little more I really need to try (the darkroom is in the garage and unheated). http://www.flickr.com/photos/zanes-photography/5802667138/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/zanes-photography/5807351002/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/zanes-photography/5806788167/ There is one bad thing I've found about scanning "RAW" in Vuescan, the resulting DNG files aren't readable by all software. While I have no problem with them in Adobe Photoshop, or Adobe Lightroom, they can't be read in Phase One's Capture One software. :-( Zane At 12:50 PM -0400 3/25/12, Ken Johnson wrote: > Oh, but it isn't a flat bed - its a slide/negative scanner, so, maybe doesn't apply... > > Ken > > On Mar 25, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Ken Johnson <kenjohnso at gmail.com> wrote: > > Are you using vuescan? On mine, I get a "quick-look" or pre-scan, and I can use that to get an idea of pic quality before going much farther. > > In addition, I can preview up to 6 (I think) negs at a time, using the carrier. > > Ken > > On Mar 25, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Paul Moortgat <paul.moortgat at pandora.be> wrote: > > I tried that with my flatbed scanner. Not so successful. > Therefor my question. It takes around 4 minutes to scan one negative. > > Paul Moortgat > > On 25 Mar 2012, at 16:11, Nick Scalise wrote: > >> Why not create a digital contact print? >> >> Scan a group of negatives on a standard flatbed scanner. Reverse them in your photo editor, and them you can choose which ones you want to Saxon with the Nikon. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sent from my iPhone. >> -- >> Nick Scalise >> >> On Mar 25, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Paul Moortgat <paul.moortgat at pandora.be> wrote: >> >>> I've a Nikon Coolscan IV ED to scan my B&W negatives from 40 year ago. >>> But I've problems to determine if it's worth to scan or not just by seeing at it. >>> Isn't there a device to see the negatives in the positive way? >>> I can't make contact prints because I stopped developing them years ago. >>> It takes such a long time to scan a negative. Then I know if it's OK or not. >>> Was it moved or out of focus? >>> >>> Paul Moortgat > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | | Photographer | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | My flickr Photostream | | http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088@N03/ | _______________________________________________ X4U mailing list X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u