on 6/6/04 8:06 AM, Bluetooth-Mac at bluetooth-mac at lists.themacintoshguy.com wrote: Andrew, Thanks for the info on the powerbook and the Z600. I figured that the connection would be slow. I've been following the Nokia 6230 as a excellent solution, IF it all works the way it should on a Mac. I hope that Steve from digest 465 lets us know of his experiences with his Nokia 6230, bluetooth, the Edge and his Mac. Here is a bit of info that I got from this page: http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=216855&Main= 216841 > Coming soon, however, is a Nokia 6230 phone, which has both EDGE and > bluetooth. > > You can set up a connection easily using a bluetooth phone and a bluetooth > Mac. > > Pair the bluetooth devices, then just make a new dialup net connection and > have it dial *99# using the bluetooth modem and it'll work, assuming you have > a data plan on your phone. > > If you can't wait for the 6230, there are several other bluetooth phones > available now which will work fine, just not quite as fast. > > You don't need any of their software, as they don't know that Macs exist, but > that doesn't mean it won't work. The "synchronization" software is to move > phone lists back and forth from your computer to your phone; the Mac does it > automatically with an OSX program with many phones. For data, as long as you > can connect the phone to the computer, it'll work like a regular modem. > The Nokia 6230 supports the 'faster' of the AT&T's Edge connectivity. Hopefully Steve can use the above info and give us some feedback on it. Steve? -- Mitch Pilchuk Pilchuk Laser Printer Repair, Inc. Serving Northern Virginia, USA Voice 703-450-0302 mitch at printerrepairguy.com http://www.printerrepairguy.com > Hey Mitch, > > The Z600 is great for WAP sites, and reasonable for email if you're > using a Palm device, downloading only the headers for your messages, > or the first few lines. I've tried a Bluetooth GPRS connection with > my PowerBook for the Internet, and found it to be almost useless. The > speed works out to only about 19k/sec, unless I did something very > wrong! > > Hope that helps, > > Andrew