On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 07:29 PM, Brian Olesky wrote: > On 12/18/02 5:43 PM, "Donald Keenan" <dkeenan2 at nycap.rr.com> wrote: > >> Charles mentions a campaign with famous writers, which I think would >> work, but only if coupled with film and television celebrities and God >> knows there are a ton of them out there who use and love macs. > > Never happen. The world already knows film and television people use > Macs. > The trick in advertising is to tell people something they don't already > know. > > Besides, there are two other widely recognized problems with celebrity > testimonials. One, research reveals that a lot of people remember the > celebrity more than the name of the product, and two, most people > assume the > celebrity just did it for the big bucks. And believe me, the cost of > celebrities lately is very, very big bucks. > > Brian > > I thought advertisers used celebrity endorsements all the time, the point being exactly the vicarious association with the celebrity. Apple did this once with the Think Different poster campaign ( a staple on eBay) and they have peppered the Switch campaign with a few lower profile but significant celebs. But maybe you're right in that Apple's matured more as a brand. I think Americans don't identify as strongly with writers as they do with other iconic figures (sports, acting) and it might stir the anti-intellectualism that's always under the surface in the American national temperament. It could backfire, depending on the research on certain celebrities' images (i.e., Limbaugh, Hilary Clinton, Madonna). Donald