On 11/23/02 4:40 PM, "Tubadude" <jmcclernan2 at comcast.net> wrote: > I will be reading this thread with great interest. Our school bought 60 > iBooks (700mhz) in May this year. Almost half of them have developed some of > the battery problems that I see posted here. By the way, they all have > Airport cards that are enabled all of the time, and all run OSX exclusively. Given Airport and OS X, these iBooks will get about 3 hours on a fully charged new battery - assuming no CD is in the computer. Just having a CD in the drive - even if it isn't being accessed constantly - will bring down battery life pretty dramatically. > We do have AppleCare, but a "genius" told me that AppleCare won't even > consider replacing a battery unless we are getting less than an hour on a > full charge. This is something of an exaggeration but I can certainly believe some AppleCare tech workers might stick to this. When my battery life dropped to just under 2 hours (again using OS X) I called and had a new battery in under a week. But at that same time I heard other iBook users complain they were told that was normal. > So much for Apple's claim that it would get "up to 6 hours". The claim is completely true - for OS 9. OS X isn't optimized for notebooks yet. It is more than a little disingenuous for Apple to be shipping OS X as the default OS and claiming battery life for OS 9. I wonder what they will do about these claims come January when OS 9 isn't a bootable OS for the new computers? -=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=- All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by frost. davidwb at spymac.com