On Sunday, Jan 26, 2003, at 17:37 US/Central, Jack Rodgers wrote: > On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 03:30 PM, Charles Martin wrote: > >> When thinking about the idea of OS X on Intel-compatible hardware, >> one has to remember something very fundamental. Even if Apple *did* >> have a complete version of OS X running in Intel-compatible hardware, >> *every* program for it would have to be *extensively* re-written to >> run on the new chip. > > Apple handled rewrites when moving to PPC from 68K. Almost ALL > software ran smoothly on the new OS. True, it was on a similar chip > but it does leave one wondering why Apple couldn't handle the > differences in software and eliminate the rewrite. The key word in my > post is 'wondering'. I don't know what Charles was getting at when he referred to "extensive rewriting." Perhaps he meant "recompilation." Certainly there is no need to rewrite for a new CPU -- that's the compiler's job. Some low-level portions of the OS would have to be recoded, and libraries that might be written in assembler for efficiency. I run stuff all the time that was written to run on Linux on a Pentium or Heptium or whatever they're calling it this week. Regards, Mike