Difficult, this - because, by replying, I feel I'm guilty as charged. On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 01:29 am, Brian Olesky wrote: > We all complain endlessly about spam, but when you send a post that's > pretty > much irrelevant to 99% of the list, isn't that close to the same thing? I don't think so - I see this as just a bit of 'family' banter. > > By the way, I'm not talking about the OT fun stuff. I actually read and > enjoyed the first few hundred posts in the Jack vs. Chas "Cracker" > wars. I objected to this, so didn't post. It's one thing to have an amusingly curmudgeonly member, who is generally well informed on Mac matters, but I find it uncomfortable when comments become rude and personal. I very much appreciate the list and just try not to post when I'm cross, only when I need an answer; can suggest a solution, or am tickled by something. |\ _,,,---,,_ Andrew Nye /,`.-'`' ;-;;,_ Swindon UK |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' ----------------------'---''(_/--' `-'\_)