On 31/10/03 6:48, "DavidWedge at aol.com" <DavidWedge at aol.com> wrote: > A machine of 500mhz & lower is NOT a good > candidate for Panther--anyone with a brain should be able to figure that out. Quite a statement! But simply not true. I think you are the one who needs a new brain. I have had all versions of 10 from the preview to Panther on this iBook 466 SE and since 10.1 I have not seen any reason to boot back into OS9. The fun thing is that with the new preview in Panther, I scroll PDF's faster on my iBook than I do on my work 2.4 GHz Pentium IV. Exposé works great too. 60 windows+ are aligned in less than 2 seconds etc. On the other hand, if you try to install something like 10.1 on a beige 233 with 64MB of RAM, you are bound to feel that it works slow. I do on mine. But if it is for a server does it matter if an application opens in 4 or 20 seconds? For me it is much more important on that machine that I can just let it work and work and work, and now the uptime is 169 days. I would not want to try that with OS9 or earlier. To paraphrase you, anyone with a brain should be able to figure out if it is stability or apparent speed that matters. Cheers, Kim