[P1] How to apply for lawsuit settlement? & Panther on 366
Kim Gammelgaard
kgani at mac.com
Sun Nov 2 02:48:17 PST 2003
On 31/10/03 6:48, "DavidWedge at aol.com" <DavidWedge at aol.com> wrote:
> A machine of 500mhz & lower is NOT a good
> candidate for Panther--anyone with a brain should be able to figure that out.
Quite a statement! But simply not true. I think you are the one who needs a
new brain.
I have had all versions of 10 from the preview to Panther on this iBook 466
SE and since 10.1 I have not seen any reason to boot back into OS9.
The fun thing is that with the new preview in Panther, I scroll PDF's faster
on my iBook than I do on my work 2.4 GHz Pentium IV. Exposé works great
too. 60 windows+ are aligned in less than 2 seconds etc.
On the other hand, if you try to install something like 10.1 on a beige 233
with 64MB of RAM, you are bound to feel that it works slow. I do on mine.
But if it is for a server does it matter if an application opens in 4 or 20
seconds? For me it is much more important on that machine that I can just
let it work and work and work, and now the uptime is 169 days.
I would not want to try that with OS9 or earlier.
To paraphrase you, anyone with a brain should be able to figure out if it is
stability or apparent speed that matters.
Cheers,
Kim
More information about the iBook
mailing list