Hi everyone, I have two iBooks - one is mine, and one is my employer's. My work iBook is a 12" 500Mhz 20GB CD-ROM, and is the machine I have a question about. (My personal iBook is a 12" 600Mhz 20GB Combo drive, in case you were wondering.) I am not a super technical person - I can find my way around my computer better than the average person, but I don't really think that's saying much. ;-) So I'm looking for a little advice. My work iBook currently has 384MB of memory, and is running 10.2.8. I use it mainly for e-mail (Mail.app), Word, Excel, accessing shared FileMaker Pro databases (running in Classic), Safari, etc. I usually have most of those applications open at once, and switch back and forth pretty frequently. I do not do any major graphics, number crunching, code compiling, etc. I find that in those applications, my machine can be slow, but not unusable. I get the spinning beach ball more than I would like (actually, what I find even more irritating than the beach ball is the delay or lag I often see before the beach ball even appears). I know that a speed bump would probably come with moving to panther (since I have panther on my home machine), but I don't think that will be an option right now - our organization has a ton of macs and they are still in the process of upgrading people from OS 9 to OS X, so as one of the first movers to Jaguar, I don't think I will see an upgrade to Panther until everyone gets to X (no seconds until everyone has had their first serving!). At this point, budgeting for hardware is starting for the next fiscal year (which starts in July). I don't think I'm on the list for a new machine (though that could change), and honestly, as long as my usage doesn't change my book will remain reasonably usable for the next year. If I keep this book for another year, though, I'm trying to make the argument that maxing out the RAM to 640MB would make a noticeable difference. It's also much cheaper than a new machine. And after all of this exposition, finally, here is my dilemma: the director of our data unit (who is in charge of hardware buying and upgrades) is telling me that, for the applications I use, an increase from 384 to 640MB will make minimal difference, that I wouldn't really notice an increase in performance, due mainly to the limitations of the processor. This runs counter to everything I've heard (basically, that increasing RAM will always help), but he's also much more of an expert than I am, so I'm wondering if he's right. Can anyone shed any light on this for me? Any websites out there, benchmarking, etc. you could direct me to? Thanks in advance for any info you can provide! pax, Sarah __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com