Perhaps going even more off-topic... On Mar 19, 2004, at 9:07 PM, Brian Olesky wrote: > I'm not sure who has the right to establish "moral requirements," but > I'm > struck by the fact that there are clearly two sides to this argument, > and I > suggest those that feel it's morally wrong to borrow a cup of their > neighbor's bandwidth without asking should simply not do it, while > those of > us who aren't bothered by it, should follow our own rules. Well, that's the thing about morality. When one reaches what they see as a moral decision, it does not often take the form of "this is moral for me," but "this is moral." Since, fortunately, none of us is in a position to impose our own morality on others with the force of law (which some are attempting to do these days in the form of a constitutional amendment about something the state has no legitimate interest in . . . ) all we are left with is making a forceful argument. At the same time, if everyone followed "their own rules" there would be Anarchie. Interesting, no? Regards, Harry Corsover ======================================= Harry Corsover, Independent Business Owner CyberWize: The Home Business Solution Amazing Travel * Health * Tax Benefits <http://www.hc.cyberwize.com> <harry at corsazzi.com> * 877-507-9562 =======================================