Jeff, Unfortunately, I'm not all that familiar with the mouses (mice?)...I'm really a trackpad/apple mouse aficionado myself, and have personally seen no need for extra bells and whistles. I do know that many people enjoy them though, and I assume that there is some degree of merit to this. That said, I'm not exactly sure which logitech mouse was bluetooth...but I'm not positive. Of course, then you may need to consider batteries. Check here for more might mouse info, or google "apple mighty mouse review" http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000667055183/ Also, consider the fact that knowing Apple, they will release a new version (maybe BT?) before long. Enjoy the new iBook! Samantha On Aug 24, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Jeff Siler wrote: > Which logitech are you talking about? Should I go with a bluetooth > model? > > jeff > > On 8/24/05, Samantha Cornell <samantha at netresults.biz> wrote: >> Either way, you can easily add the other down the road (the RAM is an >> easy user install) >> >> I have 768mb in my iBook and notice little to no difference between it >> and my iMac, with 512mb. >> >> If you're excited about the Mighty Mouse, go with that, although I've >> heard that many prefer the Logitech mouse - it may be worth >> considering. >> >> >> On Aug 24, 2005, at 2:19 PM, Jeff Siler wrote: >> >>> Right now i'm trying to decide if it would be worth it for a 512mb >>> upgrade in ram, or a Mighty Mouse for my ibook. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> On 8/24/05, Jeff Siler <jeff.siler at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I'd love to see a link to that article if anyone has it. I don't >>>> see >>>> it in the archive section of that site. >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> On 8/24/05, Ben Chong <bluesky6 at ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>> An article on a Mac website (I think it's lowendmac.com) talked >>>>> about >>>>> speed comparisons between a 256MB and a 512MB iBook to see if the >>>>> extra 256MB made a difference. >>>>> >>>>> The conclusion was that there was no difference when the app(s) are >>>>> up and running but that starting an app was faster on the system >>>>> with >>>>> more memory. >>>>> >>>>> Tiger (that's the only OS X I'm familiar with) does a good job of >>>>> making apps appear responsive across different CPU speeds. My kids >>>>> use a 500MHz 578MB iBook and I have a 1.33MHz/1.5GB one and other >>>>> than application launch times, the responsiveness (including web >>>>> browsing) is almost the same. >>>>> >>>>> I cannot say that same thing about OS 8.x running on a 180MHz 3400c >>>>> that we also have. So slooooow...... >>>>> >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> iBook mailing list >>>>> iBook at listserver.themacintoshguy.com >>>>> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/ibook >>>>> >>>>> Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random >>>>> stuff: >>>>> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> iBook mailing list >>> iBook at listserver.themacintoshguy.com >>> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/ibook >>> >>> Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random >>> stuff: >>> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> iBook mailing list >> iBook at listserver.themacintoshguy.com >> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/ibook >> >> Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random >> stuff: >> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >> > _______________________________________________ > iBook mailing list > iBook at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/ibook > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random > stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >