On Jan 20, 2005, at 6:12 PM, ibook-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com wrote: > I don't think you would walk up to my car, break the window, and rip > out my > stereo. Why would you in any way try to condone the digital equivalent? > > david Imagine this. In the future, it becomes possible to use nanotechnology to duplicate any thing you already have. Drop a pocketwatch into a vat of nanobots in oil. They swarm over and through the watch, memorizing it. Then take out the watch, wipe it off. Get an ounce of pure gold, some aluminum oxide, titanium, etc. Drop these raw elements into the nanobot oil. Two days later, you've got a duplicate watch, atomically identical. Congratulations, you've just violated copyright on the original pocketwatch and diluted the value of all the other antique pocketwatches in the world. However, you haven't actually stolen anything, have you? That's how most people think of warez. Personally, I find it karmically poisonous and deeply disturbing. But I have to admit, it's like the idea of panning for gold or chopping your own wood. People love the idea of getting something for nothing. And of course it's the largest single force that keeps people buying Windows PCs. The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. --Patrick Henry