At 4:32 PM -0500, 2/19/06, Joel Esler wrote: >Actually, your terms are backwards. It's a virus. > >And a very crappy one at that. What it most definitely is NOT is a WORM. > >J And to that I'll disagree. As do McAfee, and Symantec, and Sophos. (Although Sophos says worms are a subcategory of viruses and as such, they want to call say it is a virus because it is a worm.) Viruses are caught without any user intervention. They can ride along on other software but the use doesn't have to do anything to obtain one. Trojans are received when a user thinks a file is something that is it not and unknowingly and purposefully lets it onto their computer. Once a Trojan is received and has infiltrated your computer (by your actions), it can then have many purposes. This particular one attempts to be a worm but doesn't do it very well and only under limited circumstances that are not common. It is a worm because it attempts to modify other programs and have those programs muck with still more programs. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Robert Ameeti A celebrity is one who is known to many persons he is glad he doesn't know. -- H. L. Mencken <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>