Agreed, and I apologize for the generalization. However, I was correct in showing that the 1.83 Ghz dual core != 3.66 ghz single J On 6/1/06, Brian Pearce <brpearce at optonline.net> wrote: > > > It's two 1.83 chips on the same silicon. It's twice as fast. > > It's not quite so literal. If you go back and look at the benchmarks > for the dual processor Macs, even they aren't "twice as fast" as the > comparable single processor models would have been. > > And as Tom said, there are far too many variables involved. > > BRIAN PEARCE > <http://www.redjacketpress.com> > "Yesterday's Books for Today's Reader" > > > _______________________________________________ > iBook mailing list > iBook at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/ibook > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 > -- --Joel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/ibook/attachments/20060601/7d4100a0/attachment.html