[DuoList] Which version of OS X on 2400c

[R.Friede]

On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:51 PM, 
duolist-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com wrote:

> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:09:38 -0500
> From: dijkwel at aol.com
> Subject: [DuoList] Which version of OS X on 2400c
> To: duolist at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> Message-ID: <8C6F4637A91E0F9-D88-133E at mblk-d36.sysops.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Hi fellow listers,
>
> After some hesitation, I have finally opened my 2400c (180 MHz; 6GB; OS
> 9.1; cardbus-enabled) and put in the 96 MB RAM chip I got a few weeks
> ago. Succesfully, it turns out, as the profiler now shows I have
> available 112MB.
>
> Next, I would like to try to get OS X installed. I have read, with the
> newest version of XPostFacto, one can go up to 10.2. Has anyone tried
> and with what result? If that asking to much, how about 10.1?
>

A while back I tried to see how far I could get with 112MB RAM and 
honestly I don't think that's enough for OSX. In fact, eventually I 
ended up settling on good old 8.6 for its lower memory drain. Even 9.x 
slowed processes down too much for me. Of course YMMV!

Bob F