On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 01:18 PM, Kunga wrote: > Good points Vern. I agree. For me the booting into 9 and 2MB cache are > worth more than they may be to others. You are probably right for > most. I saw benchmarks that indicated the 2MB L3 cache made a big > performance difference - sometimes huge. But I can't cite any now for > lack of memory where. > > The info I got was from Barefeats which referenced a a powerlogix white paper comparing DDR and SDR L3 and various sizes. http://www.powerlogix.com/press/releases/2002/020826.html from this page click on the "L3 Cache performance: DDR vs SDR?" page 8 summarizes their findings. Vern.