On Oct 24, 2004, at 20:57, Kevin Willis wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2004, at 9:41 PM, Mel Krewall wrote: > >> Hal, >> In spite of what the model numbers indicate, the 8500 is a more >> capable card than the 9000 when you compare the specifications. Why >> did ATI replace the 8500 with the 9000? Who knows. But if I were >> choosing, I'd take the 8500. >> Mel >> > > Would 64 Mb 8500 be superior to a 128 Mb 9000 though? I am thinking > in terms of gaming and DVD watching. > > Thanks, > > Kevin > The GPU's were more capable. I have a friend with a 9000 and I get 15-30 better FPS with an 8500 using NASCAR Racing 2003. Ralph