Sorry I type with boxing gloves on On Feb 19, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Eric Wood wrote: > Am 19.02.2009 um 20:18 schrieb Frank Sudore: > >> There is no comparison between the intel & PPC. I have a Macpro >> Tower and it blows a Quadcore G5 i sold away. Especially with >> Photoshop & Cinema 4d. >> Mac made the right move to go to intel although I would of like to >> have seen what AMD would of done for them. > > It's getting really annoying to see "of" in place of "have" just > because people have lazy pronunciations ("have" sounds like "of," so > now folks are freaking writing it that way). > > Anyway, I think the PowerPC 750 is a viable chip - it just needs a > decent platform to use it. I haven't had the opportunity to compare > Apple's G5s to their Intels, but considering that PowerPC chips have > come to power modern game consoles, I think Apple's implementation > may have been flawed. It's sad to see it go like that, and it may > well be that Apple didn't care to fully utilise the chip with those > Intel plans underway. The slower they made the G5 systems (relative > to their new Intel machines), the better the Intel switch would > look. Same tactic they used to keep one PPC Mac model from > cannibalising sales of another, which is what my iBook G4 > demonstrates. It has a very time cache size (256k I think) to make > its 933 MHz feel pretty lame compared to whatever the PowerBook G4s > were doing. > > Eric W. > _______________________________________________ > G4 mailing list > G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4