[MPA] Audio bit depth considerations (was newbie questions)
Scott Jacob Loehr
scott.loehr at verizon.net
Tue Feb 18 08:11:52 PST 2003
>Save the conversion to 16 bits for CDs for the very last step.
>However, I don't have enough experience to know whether this is in
>fact a practical consideration.
I'm doing everything 24-bit now... the only thing that's
really changed for the 'worse' is the file size... my Mac seems to be
handling everything fine. I haven't done a test to see how many
tracks I can actually record and/or play back at once, but I've never
made the processor meters (or my Ultra 160 SCSI drives) sweat yet.
The ONLY processor-oriented limitation I've run into so far has been
with plug-ins... usually AltiVerb.
Another benefit of 24-bit recording - I spend a lot less time
worrying about getting mic preamp levels as hot as I can without
clipping... with a little more headroom, I'm finding myself hardly
EVER sticking my tail between my legs and asking players and singers
(and myself) for "one more take for me because we're now playing
louder than we did during sound check and my peak LEDs are starting
to blink at me". The downside of this is that people who work in 16
bits take a while to get used to the idea of letting something fly
with levels that average around -24 and peak at around -6. We're
STILL exceeding CD's 96dB of dynamic range, and I just LOVE not
having to face digital distortion the next day when I examine tracks.
Though it's still fairly new for me, I couldn't be happier
with archiving to DVD-R. It took away all my concerns about moving
up to 24-bit, and it solved my problem of not being able to archive
audio Image Files onto CD-R that were longer than 70 minutes. Plus,
it's drastically reducing the amount of physical space required to
archive projects.
Scott Jacob Loehr
More information about the MacProAudio
mailing list