[MPA] AIFF vs. SDII
Bob Olhsson
olh at hyperback.com
Wed Feb 11 20:55:14 PST 2004
At 6:10 PM -0700 2/11/04, Nathan Walker wrote:
>I have been prepping a project for duplication, and the other night
>I started wondering (probably because it was REALLY late) whether
>there's any discernable difference in sound quality between AIFF and
>Sound Designer II files. I realize that they end up as AIFF on the
>CD,
First off, a CD is NOT AIFF or any other file format in the
conventional sense. Some software just makes each track look like an
AIFF or a WAVE file.
AIFF and SD-II files should always sound exactly the same however due
to its reliance on the classic Mac resource fork, SD-II is rapidly
becoming an obsolete format that's not likely to be supported much
longer. (The final version of Sound Designer II was released in
January of 1998 to add support for PCI Macs and system 8!) I would
strongly suggest avoiding it at this point.
--
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN 615.385.8051
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
http://www.hyperback.com/
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
More information about the MacProAudio
mailing list