[MPA] Audio/MIDI apps
luke
etyrnal at ameritech.net
Tue Jul 13 16:08:04 PDT 2004
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, at 12:51 PM, KweYao Agyapon wrote:
> Why do you see Cubase (SL or SX prolly, since I need the notation
> function) as superior to Logic and DP?
not superior necessarily...
it does work quite well for me...
i used SX 1 (all new version had lots broken/missing) - now i use SX 2
(cubase) and all is well. it is stable... the notation
Cubase SX is very accessible. It can be simple or complex.
VST plugin support is important to me - i need as many audio processing
gimmicks as i can get my hands on...
to me - Cubase SX is very intuitive.
but i have been using midi and audio gear forever - it's my passion...
(well the music i work on with it is)
as an artist - i do not like to find out that my software does NOT do
something.
with a couple exceptions Cubase can do it all (the exceptions being
concepts i have for improving it - new inventions - but they do not
exist in ANY DAW)...
> Oh, and do you have any experience/knowledge with/about System 4,
> with its integrated (USB) MIDI/audio interface?
no - sorry...
check out...
http://www.harmony-central.com/Software/Mac/sequencing.html
do you need pc support too?
one nice thing about Logic - if you are a Mac fan - Apple is behind
them now.
More information about the MacProAudio
mailing list