>I guess then that one could conclude that this has no effect whatsoever on >the market side of things, else how do you account for Apple's miniscule >market share? One of the things Jobs did on returning to Apple was to eliminate "Market share marketing". When you dominate the market, you can use market share, but Apple, like Netscape, lost that war with Microsoft. It is over, done, finito. Apple is a niche player and is now doing an excellent job at being that. The whole "Think Different" campaign was a foundation for redefining that niche. They had to do that because during their "dark period" of the mid-90s, the existing niches (graphics, publishing, education) was greatly diminished, with Windows taking anywhere from 30 to 55 percent of those markets. While Apple still has a commanding lead in some of those niche areas, they no longer "own them", as they once did. The new niche is really "anyone" who thinks differently, in that they prefer quality over quantity; ease of use over status quo. Enter phase 2, the Switch campaign. The result is, Apple's niche is now more broad-based...like Honda's share of the auto market (which is actually lower than Apple's share of computers) That being said, there is a lot of "smoke and mirrors" surrounding market share as well. The fact is there is no unbiased organization producing accurate market share data. Regardless of the number, Apple achieves growth through growth of the computer market as a whole. Bottom line is, judge success or lack thereof, by sales and profits. Apple as been very successful by those standards. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio http://www.norbertrunning.com Please support an American Indian Elder & Medicine Man by visiting the above link. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>