> Dreamweaver is far and away the best web site management tool. Adobe > GoLive is good, but not ready for prime time. The added bonus is that > Dreamweaver (and GoLive, too) allows and supports the use of open source > web site development tools -- PHP, MySQL, xml, etc. > > On the other hand, MS FrontPage is a joke. To get the same abilities > availabile via open source, FrontPage requires proprietary code be > installed on the server for all the "special" features in FrontPage to > work. The problem with that is Microsoft's legendary (and criminal?) > lack of security. By that I mean, an otherwise secure server suddenly > turns into a security sieve as soon as you install any of the FrontPage > enhancements. Trust me, I've been burned once ...that's all it took to > switch. > > Ron Ron's right about FrontPage. Find a REALLY bad looking site and View Source and, oh, 8 times out of 10, it's FrontPage. I have never used it, just seen the blights on the internet it has caused - the goofy text that's grainy and butt ugly, the myriad of pathetic lines, buttons...utter crap. I have used GoLive since it was CyberStudio (PageMill before that), and have served on beta test teams since the beginning. If you're a Photoshop or Illustrator person, you'll be right at home with GoLive's interface. In order to broaden my horizons and also as research for an upcoming article, I am building a new site in Dreamweaver. So far there are things I love about it, and things that are frustrating me (although I must admit those are interface rather than capability issues). You really can't go wrong with either one - but they're both expensive to get into the first time. My $.02 Pete petez at macmaineiac.com www.macmaineiac.com