On Nov 1, 2003, at 3:16 PM, Tarik Bilgin wrote: > > Most software doesn't just "work", you have to learn to "work" with > it, but while businessmen were wrestling with the computer operators > who in turn wrestled with "mini computers", Apple in the 1980's > somehow got a reputation for building a Desktop Environment that just > "works", an "insanely great" "computer for the rest of us".... > So, a big thumbs up to Apple for creating the iMac,Powerbook G4, > Darwin project and OSX including Aqua, but a big thumbs down for not > yet producing a Finder that "just works". I hear EVERYBODY complaining that the finder doesn't "work" but I've yet to see any one explain WHY it doesn't work. I am thrilled with the finder in 10.3. Sure, it's different than it used to be, but it is incredibly more convenient for me and my work flow. I'm able to navigate to precisely the correct location to find my files, and the actual navigation is much faster than anything before. I HATED the multi window setup of Mac OS 9 and I'm thrilled to have something as powerful as column view, especially when coupled with snap-open folders. So my question to those who complain that the finder doesn't "work" is why? What part about this software causes you so much headaches, and to you Tarik, what makes explorer.exe any better than the finder? It's one thing to state that you don't like something, but it's an entirely different thing to state WHY you don't like something. -- Jesse Williams-Proudman Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions +1.206.778.8777 :: jesse at blueboxdev.com