Michael Bigley paused, thought it over, and spoke thusly: >>According to what 'fragmented' reasoning? Slashdot is two things, >>links to other news items, and comments on the news. Most people >>don't read the original items on Slashdot, they just comment on the >>comments. If you read the actual items, it ends up being a lot more >>enlightening. > >I am not a SlashDot member, my SlashDot stuff comes across RSS feeds >in Watson; I read the stuff in the hope of an actual useful link. >You are the first person who has ever defended it's credibility to >me. Since their is no editorial control, I suspect much more >"opinion presented as fact" or "Rush Limbaugh style of fact finding" >than real information. Unless there are verifiable links, it is >commentary. On Slashdot, and Apple.Slashdot, every 'article', or topic thread, begins with outside links. In a way, one never needs to look at opinions, per se, at all. I set my prefs on slashdot for opinions rated +5 minimum, so i never need wade through the flamebait, redundancies, and lunacy that the Slashdot 'blog-like' opinions are rightly noted for. I use it differently, and I get different results. makes sense, no? It's sort of like a Preferences version of GIGO (the old GarbageIN GArbageOut programming truism). I see links, all the time to NASA, major (and minor) media, universities, etc. It was there that the 10.2.8 problems first broke. it was there that i first got wind of the big Virginia Tech order for G5, the impending end of NASA's galileo mission, etc. I see interviews with Linus Torvalds from time-to-time, informative tips (and wacky ideas) regarding Apache, open source issues, copyright issues, (balanced, as a rule, meaning equal parts reasonable and loony, again, easily edited 'up-front'), and many other scientific discussions that don't get much play in the Mac-centric, or Linux-centric online media. It's geeky, which is okay, but also means that it draws a lot of people who need more 'outside' activities, no question about that. ~flipper