<blockquote cite="http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/editors/2005/08/ inteldevcon/index.php?lsrc=editorsblog"> What Otellini showed off were Merom, Conroe, and Woodcrest—new processors for mobile, desktop, and server computers, respectively. (Borrowing a page from Steve Jobs, Otellini revealed that he had been running the presentation from laptop with a Merom processor.) All three processors are dual-core, use 65-nanometer production technology, and are 64-bit—the last part of that is welcome news to those who feared the switch to Intel’s current lineup meant sliding back to 32-bit computing once Intel chips start showing up in Macs. Otellini even mentioned that Intel has 10 quad-core (that is, four processor cores per chip) projects in the works—all of which would be great to see in future Macs. [Currently scheduled to ship second and third quarters of 2006] </blockquote> Sad news for all the doomsayers who were convinced that the move to Intel would lead to the slaughtering of innocents... I mean, a switch from 64 to 32 bits... not to mention those who were sure they knew the entire Intel roadmap for the future and that there would be no surprises from Intel between Jobs' keynote and the end of the PPC Mac.