On Aug 30, 2005, at 12:28 PM, ~flipper wrote: > As for Firefox, I use it for the extensions, but it is not a > Macintosh app by any stretch. The Firefox Mac port obeys all the guidelines for Mac, but the menus and icons are poorly designed. I haven't looked at Firefox on Windows but on x86 and PowerPC linux, and Mac OS X it has *huge* memory leak problems. So bad it's become known as "FireHog" in developer circles. > I like Firefox, but it's obviously designed to be 'better than > Explorer, on Windows"...to which I say: "Who cares?". But, the > extensibility of it makes it my choice, day-to-day, above all > others. (And I was reluctant, in a way, to make it the 'default' > here, after purchasing OmniWeb, Opera, etc...but, when you're the > best, you're the best.) The Gecko rendering engine of Firefox is proven, and it's a more secure browser than IE. Safari was a little wet behind the ears until ver 2.0 came out in Tiger. Safari has passed the Acid2 tests - the first web browser to do so - and I find no websites any longer, that adhere to web standards, that Safari won't reliably render. Unfortunately there's a few sites that don't adhere to web standards and Firefox is still better on those. -- Chris