[Ti] Intel shows off 64-bit dual core processors for mobile, desktop, and servers

Henry Kalir kalirhe at umdnj.edu
Wed Aug 31 22:35:25 PDT 2005


Chris Olson wrote:

> On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Tristan Gulyas wrote:
>
>> The big thing I will miss in this transition is AltiVec.  Rosetta  
>> won't (currently) translate AltiVec instructions so we can't run  our 
>> G4/G5 apps on it.  The Freescale dual core G4 is certainly a  
>> contender for PowerBooks (and it would make sense for Apple to  
>> pioneer dual core mobile tech, just like the old days).  They  
>> haven't abandoned the PPC yet - or so they say and I'd say that the  
>> PowerBooks are due for one more revision between now and then.
>
>
> It came to light today that Adobe will probably not have an x86  
> version of Photoshop, or any of the other apps in Adobe CS, available  
> for OS X on x86 when Apple releases the hardware.  Bruce Chizen  
> offers a glimpse of reality instead of the twisted illusion of the  
> Reality Distortion Field where you simply click a checkbox in Xcode  
> and BOOM! instant fat binary.
>
> In an interview with CNet, Bruce Chizen was asked:
> "Let's talk about Apple Computer. What is the early word about moving  
> Mac apps over to work on Intel-based systems? Not so easy?"
>
> Chizen: "Steve (Jobs) likes to trivialize the process and make it  
> seem easy, but moving the apps over is not that easy...Getting over  
> to MacTel is work..........It's not that easy because you have to  
> compile the app, you have to test it. If you look at most testing  
> cycles, for any complex cycle, for any complex product, that's three  
> or four months until it's out. You just can't turn a switch and get a  
> MacTel product--and Steve knows that."
> CNet: So, when do you think that Adobe will be ready to take Photoshop?
> Chizen: "I haven't given a date yet, I'd be surprised if we did a  
> MacTel only release. I think you'll find us doing what we did with OS  
> X, which is to enhance the product and support the new environment at  
> the same time. If you look at our product cycles for products like  
> Photoshop and Creative Suite, they tend to be in the 18- to 24-month  
> cycle, which means that you're talking about either Q4 of '06 or Q1  
> of '07."
>
> -- 
>
> Chris

How disingenuous of Adobe! Their Mac version of Photoshop has been 
second banana to the Wintel-version for quite some years now.
If Apple sales pick up and its market share moves up to the double 
digits from the current paltry 3%, Mr. Chizen will not be employing this 
tone.

Best,

Henry



More information about the Titanium mailing list