On Mar 14, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Tarik Bilgin wrote: > Yes, and these are floating point operations, exactly what the > G5.excels at. If you work with floating point operations then the G5 > is a no-brainer. Chris' point was that for those who don't do work > that needs lots of heavy floating point maths, the speed increase of > upgrading to G5 is negligible. Exactly. The majority of computing tasks depend on integer performance, not floating point. IMHO, it's really too bad the G5 stole the show, because I think the G4 is a better all-around PowerPC cpu. The G5 is nothing but a stripped down Power4 server cpu. And typically, just like it did in the past with the Pentium Pro line, server cpu's don't make good all-around desktop cpu's. Again, that's why I think engineering resources would be much better spent on a dual-core G4 PowerBook, rather than a G5. The dual-core G4's are already there, reportedly running at 2.0 GHz with a ~600 Mhz frontside bus, and very low power dissipation (something like 15 watts per core). Somebody just has to weld one to the logic board in a PowerBook to make it happen. -- Chris