Well then.. here's my take.. for my money apple has miscalculated. Just as it thought it would use Apeture to sell hardware and now Adobe has come in with a competing product that 1. supports more RAW formats and 2. supports more computers ... apple is going to be faced with comparisons from the PC vendors machines all supplying dual layer drives etc etc and people are going to be asking why Apple's MacBook doesn't have a dual layer drive for one. i assume it's to cut cost? no firewire 800... perhaps annoying to video buffs on the move? no dual layer... drive. suspicous performance numbers... what's better firewire 400 or firewire 800 that with an adapter also supports firewire 400 devices? should I be buying one of these el cheapo USB2 harddrive enclosures they have in Thailand ... don't know if it's Prolific or not. but it's a lot smaller than the f/w 400 only Mercury On the Go enclosure I use now. happy with my AI book for now until I see significant performance gains with the Intel boxes. Quoting John Griffin <jwegriffin at mac.com>: > A bad day for those who just got new G4 Powerbooks...maybe. > > It might be a bad day for me as well with my brand new iMac iSight, > but I am happy to stay with PowerPC as long as I can. I just cant > wait for the bug reports to start pouring in on these bleeding edge > machines... > > jg_______________________________________________ > Titanium mailing list > Titanium at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/titanium > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.