On 17-Jan-06, at 2:35 PM, Chris Olson wrote: > On Jan 17, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Ardeshir Mehta wrote: > >> That said, does anyone know of any experiments done in a proper >> scientific way (with double blind studies, etc., etc.) to find out >> which is the more reliable OS - Mac OS or Windows? > > No studies, but literally millions of deployments speaks for itself. Does it really? Or is it marketing that is the cause of these "many more millions of deployments"? Speaking as a certified scientist and an amateur logician, I *personally* would not accept "many more millions of deployments" as proof of anything ... except, of course, of many more millions of deployments. But then again, maybe that's just me. > Windows is the hands down winner. Windows application developers > have been able to deploy solutions and move from revision to > revision pretty much seamlessly over the years, with only minor > glitches aka Windows XP SP2. I was speaking of *reliability*: not of moving over "from revision to revision". OIOW, I was wondering how many times the average Windows user has to stop the work he is doing to solve computer problems, as compared with the average Mac user. > Apple, OTOH has jumped ship too many times. The transition from > Apple to Mac made all Apple software obsolete. Then we went from > 68K to PPC, then OS 9 to OS X, then PPC to Intel, each time adding > complexity, development cost, and alienating legacy users and > developers. I dunno about that. I can still use all the OS 7.2 software I bought for my Performa back in 1997! > Reliability in Enterprise and business has way factors than just > technical excellence. No doubt. But I was just wondering in my post which platform is the more reliable, not which is the technically more excellent. (I *know* that the Mac OS is technically more excellent than Windows!) Cheers. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/titanium/attachments/20060117/327a3114/attachment.html