On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 02:37 PM, Eugene Lee wrote: > : That article focuses on the ability to *write* a virus for the Mac. > > I respectfully disagree. :-) > > The article strongly suggests, without actually stating, that OS X is > more vulnerable to possible viruses because there are more programming > languages available on OS X to exploit the system: AppleScript, > several shells, Perl, Python, Tcl, Ruby, etc. Of course the only way > to take advantage of any of these languages is to trick the user into > executing some malicious bit of code. . . . that's exactly what I mean by focusing on writing it, rather than distributing it. And why I said, you can *write* a virus for any computer - the whole issue is distributing it, so focusing on the languages, and with a wave of the hand saying "all you have to do is trick the users into running it" dismisses the whole crux of the issue. SR