On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 04:53 PM, Bill Reburn wrote: > Depends on what he's doing with them. > > Why are you scanning at 600dpi anyway? And at what dimensions are you > scanning? If ALL you are doing is scanning in 5x7/3x5's or whatever > and not > doing ANY resizing, just printing at the scanned size then Mr. Wiser is > totally correct. You're scanning in way too much information. Drop it > by > half and you'll always have the option of doubling your print size for > a > future application. > > 600dpi is often my BARE minimum, as I like to enlarge quite a bit.. > While > scanning photographs is not the highest quality process I prefer to > factor > in some extra pixels for later discretion. > > More details? And what OS are you using? I know we're in X-Newbies > here, > just asking to help you with helpful answers. > > On 1/21/03 1:34 PM, "Ed Wiser" <ewiser at bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> No need to scan photo's at 600dpi. you can drop it down to 150 dpi for >> printing and everything will work much better. > > I'm actually scanning photos to produce a book from Apple using iphoto. I have looked everywhere for information about what scan resolution to use to produce a book and I've turned up only one sentence from Apple to the effect that you should use your camera pictures at the highest possible resolution. I haven't read anything about what resolution to use if you're using scanned images. I also don't know if iphoto optimizes your files and thereby changes your resolutions before your book gets uploaded. If anyone has produced a book, I'd be interested in your advice. TIA, Dave Whelpley G4 MacOs 10.2.3