>>At 8:47 PM -0500 2/26/04, Alex wrote: >>>Have you installed software for a Canon scanner recently? It's one >>>of the crappiest in existence > >On Thursday, Feb 26, 2004, at 23:27 Canada/Eastern, Vincent Cayenne wrote: >>Is there support for that assertion somewhere? At 7:34 AM -0500 2/27/04, Alex wrote: >Wolf Rentzsch has a quick overview at ><http://rentzsch.com/suck/canonLiDE30Scanner>. So your statement was based on the experiences of two users, neither being yourself? >Anyway, aren't we talking about a piece of software that fills up >console.log with a useless message every second, day in and day out? >Res ipsa loquitur. *We're* not talking about that piece of software. *I* was asking about the source of your statement - "It's one of the crappiest in existence". Without offering any opinion whatsoever on the item, I was trying to determine the basis for the slam on the unit. You've answered that in a way that now allows me to properly evaluate your statement. Thanks. >>>, and it installs background processes that do exactly that. >>>Solution -- get rid of it. >> >>Wow. When I think of the problems I could have solved... > >Feel free to suggest a better one. I am, even without your "permission", indeed free to suggest alternative solutions. I'm just amused at yours... -- The point of quotations is that one can use another's words to be insulting. - Amanda Cross