On Friday, Feb 27, 2004, at 07:52 Canada/Eastern, Vincent Cayenne wrote: >>> At 8:47 PM -0500 2/26/04, Alex wrote: >>>> Have you installed software for a Canon scanner recently? It's one >>>> of the crappiest in existence >> >> On Thursday, Feb 26, 2004, at 23:27 Canada/Eastern, Vincent Cayenne >> wrote: >>> Is there support for that assertion somewhere? > > At 7:34 AM -0500 2/27/04, Alex wrote: >> Wolf Rentzsch has a quick overview at >> <http://rentzsch.com/suck/canonLiDE30Scanner>. > > So your statement was based on the experiences of two users, neither > being yourself? I'm not sure how you draw that inference. What two users? And what would be the point of my repeating what somebody else has already said? >> Anyway, aren't we talking about a piece of software that fills up >> console.log with a useless message every second, day in and day out? >> Res ipsa loquitur. > > *We're* not talking about that piece of software. Beg your pardon. My mistake, I'm sure. > *I* was asking about the source of your statement - "It's one of the > crappiest in existence". Read your own lines. You were asking about "support for that assertion". The source of the assertion is myself -- quite obviously, since it was not in quotes and did not refer to any other source. > Without offering any opinion whatsoever on the item, I was trying to > determine the basis for the slam on the unit. You've answered that in > a way that now allows me to properly evaluate your statement. Thanks. You're welcome. I'm not quite sure what you are after -- support for? source of? basis for?-- but as long as you are happy... > I am, even without your "permission", indeed free to suggest > alternative solutions. I'm just amused at yours... Excellent. I'll be looking forward. f